Search found 53 matches
- Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:07 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: Feedback
- Topic: Status of this Web site
- Replies: 23
- Views: 43297
Re: Status of this Web site
Joanna, what ever became of your "reloadable QuickLoads" project?
- Sun Jul 24, 2016 5:59 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: Feedback
- Topic: Status of this Web site
- Replies: 23
- Views: 43297
Re: Status of this Web site
...Marc is still renewing the domain name, and I'm still hosting the site... I've recently moved it to a newer and faster server. I'm happy to continue hosting it for a while... My January 14 PM to "mash" remains unread and in my Outbox. Is "mash" Marc? In any case, thanks to Marc and you for keepi...
- Sun Jul 24, 2016 5:56 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: Feedback
- Topic: Status of this Web site
- Replies: 23
- Views: 43297
Re: Status of this Web site
...the forum does seem to have somewhat "died", and the cause was largely one rotten apple spoiling the barrel. A certain member who was openly and relentlessly critical of everything about this forum, (one might say suspicously so), including repeated personal attacks on one of the admins, more or...
- Sat Jan 16, 2016 5:45 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: Feedback
- Topic: Status of this Web site
- Replies: 23
- Views: 43297
Re: Status of this Web site
Perhaps my post was premature. Two days later, the PM to "masch" still hasn't moved from "Outbox" to "Sent."Sal Santamaura wrote:Thanks, Barry. As they say in the For Sale category in the US LFF, PM sent.BarryWilkinson wrote:...Perhaps it may be worth sending him a PM?...
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
- Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:25 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: Feedback
- Topic: Status of this Web site
- Replies: 23
- Views: 43297
Re: Status of this Web site
Thanks, Barry. As they say in the For Sale category in the US LFF, PM sent.BarryWilkinson wrote:...Perhaps it may be worth sending him a PM?...
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
- Thu Jan 14, 2016 6:06 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: Feedback
- Topic: Status of this Web site
- Replies: 23
- Views: 43297
Re: Status of this Web site
Thanks for replying, Barry. If you're referring to "masch," I hope he'll provide an explanatory post in this thread. It would be nice to know why things have gone the way they did as well as how he might be able to revitalize the forum.BarryWilkinson wrote:...Marc seems to be maintaining the domain...
- Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:34 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: Feedback
- Topic: Status of this Web site
- Replies: 23
- Views: 43297
Status of this Web site
A bit more than three years ago, in a thread on the US large format photography forum, I defended this site against criticism that it was, essentially, "dead." At that time, while activity here was low, there was still ongoing posting of both new threads and responses to existing ones. Within the la...
- Sat Sep 06, 2014 5:50 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Fuji Pro 160S 5 x 4 sheet film
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8754
- Sun May 12, 2013 8:43 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Ilford ULF film run 2013
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8736
Re: Ilford ULF film run 2013
Here's a higher level link for anyone who prefers emulsions other than FP4 Plus: http://www.ag-photographic.co.uk/unusual--ultra-large-format-sheet-film-29-c.asp I'm smitten with Delta 100 printed on Ilfobrom Galerie, a combination that delivers exquisite prints, in my opinion. :) Also, this is the ...
- Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:58 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Extreme Flattery
- Replies: 9
- Views: 15694
Re: Extreme Flattery
...I now see that Frank P is banned from the LFPF, that's in addition to all of the other Forums, where he was previously banned from Frank is, err...............something comparable to ones opinion on Las Vegas, you love it or you *at* it... Andrew, Frank wasn't banned from the US Large Format For...
- Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:53 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Extreme Flattery
- Replies: 9
- Views: 15694
Re: Extreme Flattery
It appears that some time poster on this forum, Sal Santamaura, keeps a database on that well known and much admired American photographer and poster on The LF Forum Frank Petronio. Do you think that he's doing the same to anybody here? Vanman. Pete, I don't keep a database on Frank's nonsense. The...
- Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:39 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: Wet Processing
- Topic: Comparison of Developers
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10397
Re: Comparison of Developers
Even if your scanner's transparency illuminator is inconvenient to use, you have another "light box:" the display screen of the computer you're typing on. :) You really need to examine the negatives optically. A more powerful loupe or some other means of magnification is necessary to eliminate the s...
- Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:08 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: Wet Processing
- Topic: Comparison of Developers
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10397
Re: Comparison of Developers
I don't know whether the scanner's capabilities are insufficient to reveal differences between those negatives, but you should certainly be able to find out by simply putting them on a light box and examining them with a moderately powerful loupe, say 15x to 30x. Your scanner's transparency illumina...
- Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:32 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: RIP
- Replies: 69
- Views: 40711
Re: RIP
...I've just 're-thought' this one Sal.................................. here's another consideration, an image which I've recently posted in another thread on here:- http://www.andrewren.com/Summer_2009/21.html it bucks the trend towards 'straight landscape' f64 'AA style stuff'... I admit my comm...
- Tue Dec 25, 2012 6:06 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: RIP
- Replies: 69
- Views: 40711
Re: RIP
...there are many members over on the 'LFPF' who have either indicated or said that they are pretty apprehensive of posting on that forum, because of a few regularly posting hot heads and semi-nutters on there who love nothing other than a quick sharp written skirmish, which often ends up in belitt...