Page 2 of 2
Re: Modern Victorian Photography
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 8:28 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Neil Barnes
Relations with our new interplanetary neighbours were unfortunately soured when their leader was mistaken for a camera...
Re: Modern Victorian Photography
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:27 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by SteveH
Are you absolutely sure you cant use movements to make me look like Arnie?
Re: Modern Victorian Photography
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:48 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Andrew Plume
Charles/Joanna
How about moving this across to the new 'wet plate forum', set up today?
andrew
Re: Modern Victorian Photography
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:01 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Joanna Carter
Andrew Plume wrote:How about moving this across to the new 'wet plate forum', set up today?
See, you only had to ask
Re: Modern Victorian Photography
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:52 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Andrew Plume
yep
and you did it, thx
andrew
Re: Modern Victorian Photography
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 1:57 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Andrew Plume
I can add nothing to 'the caption competition'.........................................
but can say that the camera is a Vageeswari, which were manufactured by Vageeswari Camera Works in India and if anyone is interested, they crop up fs on ebay on a monthly basis or so - ebay seller 'photolud' has an interest in restoring them
note - I have no personal or financial connection to said 'photolud'
andrew
Re: Modern Victorian Photography
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:19 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Lucy Telford
Thank goodness someone has had the good idea to start a forum on this... There are some of us large format users out there who stilll like to dabble with the dangerous chemicals instead of only using film
Re: Modern Victorian Photography
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:31 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Andrew Plume
and endorsed by me too Lucy, even though I've yet to cross over to the wet stuff........................
regards
andrew