Page 2 of 3

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:38 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by michaelfinch
Just signed. Not because I'm a big user of Velvia but because I use 5x4 for a variety of reasons from straight forward pics to copy work etc. It's a valuable tool and losing any emulsion is potentially another of those deaths by a thousand cuts....................

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 5:14 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Trail Images
I checked B&H this morning to see if the new 20% price increase had taken place here in the USA as we were warned about a week or so back. Regretfully B&H shows V-50 discontinued in 4x5. I just bought 10 boxes there last week under the old price. However, I did notice for the first time ever in buying from B&H the V-50 was a bit shorted dated too......... :(

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:22 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by michaelfinch
On Radio 4 yesterday it was reported that Kodak was selling off its patents; nothing new in that. But it was also stated that Kodak no longer manufactured film. Have I missed something? I know they're pulling out of reversal materials but if the Beeb is correct, that is just as serious as the Velvia situation.

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:28 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Trail Images
In checking the Kodak site there is no notice with respect to the Porta or Ektar negative films being discontinued. As these were fairly later products they released I suspect they will remain viable as long as Kodak does. I would think as time goes by and if Fuji continues down it's path with respect to the dropping of reversal films it will only enhance Kodak's position and sales on their negative films. This of course is all related to the LF products as I really do not follow the other formats that closely. I'm already aware of at least 5 photogs here in the USA that have switched to Porta and Ektar only in the last month after MANY years of using Fuji reversal films exclusively. These decisions were all predicated on Fuji's once again choice in dropping V-50 in LF.

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:18 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by michaelfinch
I suspect the reporter should have referred to reversal film rather than just film. But we are where we are. I don't have much experience of Portra but Ektar scans beautifully. Anyone got experience of these two emulsions?

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:51 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Baxter
I have a small freezer which I bought for the previous time Velvia was being discontinued. It's sitting idle in the garage. Free to anyone who wants to come to Lymington and collect it.

Sorry to hear that Fuji have made this decision and I too have signed the petition.

Bax

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:32 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by craigmagee
Guys at Japan Exposures say they haven't heard anything over there about Fuji discontinuing at least V50 (thats the only one I asked about) in sheet sizes.

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:58 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by joolsb
michaelfinch wrote:I suspect the reporter should have referred to reversal film rather than just film. But we are where we are. I don't have much experience of Portra but Ektar scans beautifully. Anyone got experience of these two emulsions?
I've been using Portra (both flavours) and Ektar a fair bit over the last couple of years and I have to admit that I absolutely love Portra - especially the 400 variant. Ektar is a bit of a curious beast and, whilst I've had enough positive experiences to persevere with it, I've also had a fair few negative ones as well. All the Kodak C41 films scan beautifully - which is more than I can say for Velvia (unless you have a drum scanner and can dig that extra 10% out of the shadows, of course).

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:48 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Thingy
The way things are going we could end up going full circle and having to make our own glass plates, in situ! :shock: :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_ePMk5l ... re=related

And this is for those who can afford the Velvia but not the camera.... :mrgreen:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IEcHx_W2AQ

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 7:32 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Trail Images
Wow, that wet plate process looked a bit over the top for me...... I flunked basic chem class too. Although I do have a full-on painter's breathing apparatus for the dark room...... :mrgreen:

The second U-tube was a bit easier to take in, I already have a saw-horse or I guess you could call it a "quad-pod" sitting in the garage........ :D ..............thanks for sharing these.

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 3:42 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by George S
They keep chipping away at LF film.

What's next I wonder?

I've signed up btw.

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:31 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Charles Twist
It's not just colour film. It seems that Efke are in trouble too.
I have just seen 4 skeletons on horseback galloping past the house. Should I worry?
Charles

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:18 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Trail Images
I'd not heard about any other issues beyond the Fuji scuffle as of late. Sadly, it looks like the economic health of remaining film producers no matter what size or flavor are in a justification struggle throughout. It's hard to figure at times when all of a sudden there is a new product released that makes very little sense. This would include film and film cameras that fit right into the wheelhouse of digital platforms. Go figure?..... :?:

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:46 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Valerio Trigari
I just signed the petition and I really hope it will reach the target of 2,500 signatures. It's going to be very sad if they will really stop producing this wonderful film!...

Val

Re: Velvia discontinuation

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:09 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
by Marizu
I wonder what the implications of this will be:

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=27689

Ouch :(