210 or a 240mm lens

A place to talk about photography, the meaning of life and anything that doesn't quite fit elsewhere
Post Reply
du a gwyn
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:44 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Location: North Wales

210 or a 240mm lens

Post by du a gwyn » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:58 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

hello,what lens do you recommend for portrait on a 5x4 format.it will be used mostly for 3/4 shot.
diolch.

User avatar
IanG
Forum Hero
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:21 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Location: Aegean/West Midlands
Contact:

Post by IanG » Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:18 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

A 210mm is very practical and reasonably priced. 240mm's tend to be more expensive because newer models 60's onwards cover 10"x8".

My 210 MC Symmar cost me about £125 last year and is in mint condition it pays to shop around & abroad. It's ideal for portraits. I had 24omm but I'm not sure what happened to it.

Ian

masch
Founder
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:49 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by masch » Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:24 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

210 lenses are good, bright, cheap and plentiful.

I have a Caltar 210 (rebadged Rodenstock), which I can only recommend. Get a f5.6 or thereabout.
They were very popular for product shots in studios for ages which is why so many are going around now. :)

Marc
Real Photographers use METAL cameras.....
...and break their backs in the process... :)
http://homepage.mac.com/mjjs/Photography/

vanman
Forum Hero
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:25 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Location: Staffordshire

210 or 240 for portraits

Post by vanman » Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:31 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

I've used a 210 Repromaster with a front mounted shutter and was very satisfied with the results.
Vanman

Post Reply