Asymmetric movements - gadget or gimmick?

A place to talk about photography, the meaning of life and anything that doesn't quite fit elsewhere
Charles Twist
Founder
Posts: 721
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:33 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Location: Cleveland
Contact:

Re: Asymmetric movements - gadget or gimmick?

Post by Charles Twist » Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:45 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00

Plutôt, vieux haricot.
Charles

User avatar
Thingy
Forum Hero
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:13 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Location: Orpington, Kent

Re: Asymmetric movements - gadget or gimmick?

Post by Thingy » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:51 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

Having used my 45SU for a while now I can add that assym focussing has proved very useful on occasions when I've had very limited time to take an image where I have wanted to quickly get foreground & background in focus - sometimes when afloat. Limited time often means 5 minutes or less after setting up, etc, when on a coach trip to a remote location. For architectural images I just tilt the front standard and don't bother transferring the milimeter or two of rear assym movement across. The 45S's lack of interchangable bellows would be a serious pain to use with my Schneider 58XL, whereas the bag bellows make the minicsule movements needed a doddle. I also find I have more movements using the bag bellows with my Nikon 90mm f4.5 lens than when using the universal bellows. Of course, if didn't photograph buildings in narrow streets this would be unnecessary. :lol:
Love is an Ebony mounted with a Cooke PS945.......

Post Reply