If you want comments on your images.
-
TimH
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:50 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Hampshire
Post
by TimH » Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:36 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Right - Here we go - only the third attempt at an Image with Efke 820 I/R The Neg was so thin it was almost transparent bar the foggy base of this material so I guess its quite underexposed (bar the nettles which are about right) . I'm still playing with this stuff - its my first real dabble with I/R since the demise of Konica 750 in 120 roll.
Ok - what do you really think .. answers on a postcard or append
Thanks Tim......
Digi-snapper now (finally) turned LF shooter hmm been doing this long enuff - Now LF photog !
-
Sean Lewis
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:43 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Workshop Images: http://500px.com/Sean_Lewis
- Location: Slindon, West Sussex
-
Contact:
Post
by Sean Lewis » Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:42 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Very nice Tim, I might have to get some of that stuff myself! Tasty composition too.
Sean
-
Marizu
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:41 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Post
by Marizu » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:11 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
That's nice. I'm not sure that it is underexposed.
I shoot Efke IR and my negs do look very thin but they tend to print easily on the enlarger so I figure that they are ok.
Let us know if you manage to build the density in future negatives.