First Wet-plates
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:28 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
First Wet-plates
Here are a couple of images from the wet-plate workshop run by Carl at the Clocktower.
I set the camera up, poured and developed the plates, but one of the others did the honours with the lens-cap for my "self portrait".
The second shot was at the allotments, and was a bit over exposed and hugely over developed.
Both are whole plate on trophy aluminium.
Hope you like them!
Susie
I set the camera up, poured and developed the plates, but one of the others did the honours with the lens-cap for my "self portrait".
The second shot was at the allotments, and was a bit over exposed and hugely over developed.
Both are whole plate on trophy aluminium.
Hope you like them!
Susie
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:32 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Chester, UK
Re: First Wet-plates
Susie, they are lovely! Congratulations on tackling such a medium! What is the reason for the light patch to the left of the door in the first photo, flare?
George
George
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:28 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Re: First Wet-plates
Thank you George.
It could be flare, yes. It wasn't my camera and so didn't have a lens hood!!
I think one reason why LF doesn't phaze me too much is because even in smaller formats I much prefer to use a tripod: even in 35mm I use a table-top one.
But tackling wet-plate was such a smooth process with Carl's workshop, I can't thank him enough. It really was a fantasic week-end, which left my brain teeming with ideas.
Susie
It could be flare, yes. It wasn't my camera and so didn't have a lens hood!!
I think one reason why LF doesn't phaze me too much is because even in smaller formats I much prefer to use a tripod: even in 35mm I use a table-top one.
But tackling wet-plate was such a smooth process with Carl's workshop, I can't thank him enough. It really was a fantasic week-end, which left my brain teeming with ideas.
Susie
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:54 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Re: First Wet-plates
Without wishing to criticise the image itself, was it taken with a very long lens? The depth seems very compressed - it's as if the steps are just lines on a wall... or is that an artefact of the process?
It's doing my head in!
Neil
It's doing my head in!
Neil
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:28 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Re: First Wet-plates
Hi Neil,
It was an 8x10 camera with a reducing mask in the plate holder to go down to 6.5x8.5. From memory the lens was about 12", so it is only slightly long for the format. The same camera and lens was used for both shots.
Susie
It was an 8x10 camera with a reducing mask in the plate holder to go down to 6.5x8.5. From memory the lens was about 12", so it is only slightly long for the format. The same camera and lens was used for both shots.
Susie
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:54 am Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Re: First Wet-plates
Thanks, Susie.
As you say, that seems about the right lens for the plate size. And on this screen, I see the image about 7.5" across, so only slightly larger than the original image.
Curiously, I see depth in the allotment image without a problem, but with the higher-contrast portrait, it's somehow just flat.
Am I the only one seeing this effect? Has my head actually exploded? Have I spent too long with Victorian 3-d images?
Neil
p.s. I love the look of the images... it's just this perspective thing that's hurting my head!
As you say, that seems about the right lens for the plate size. And on this screen, I see the image about 7.5" across, so only slightly larger than the original image.
Curiously, I see depth in the allotment image without a problem, but with the higher-contrast portrait, it's somehow just flat.
Am I the only one seeing this effect? Has my head actually exploded? Have I spent too long with Victorian 3-d images?
Neil
p.s. I love the look of the images... it's just this perspective thing that's hurting my head!
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:28 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: North Oxon
Re: First Wet-plates
Susie
these are a great start, good for you - one as far as I know with this process, is often going to be subject to the odd result - the white patch on your self portrait is an example - I don't feel that 'dof' is an issue with that image - the allotment image is very interesting...........................
best regards
andrew
these are a great start, good for you - one as far as I know with this process, is often going to be subject to the odd result - the white patch on your self portrait is an example - I don't feel that 'dof' is an issue with that image - the allotment image is very interesting...........................
best regards
andrew
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:01 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Bolton
- Contact:
Re: First Wet-plates
A great start Susie.
Looking forward to seeing many more.
Tony
Looking forward to seeing many more.
Tony
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 12:56 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Aberdeenshire
Re: First Wet-plates
Great stuff. Carl is a wonderful, patient and good humoured teacher isn't he? Had a great day down in Glasgow on Saturday at a "consolidation" day with him and now my tin has arrived
Glad to see this process is gathering momentum...
Glad to see this process is gathering momentum...
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:28 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: North Oxon
Re: First Wet-plates
Lucy Telford wrote:Great stuff. Carl is a wonderful, patient and good humoured teacher isn't he? Had a great day down in Glasgow on Saturday at a "consolidation" day with him and now my tin has arrived
Glad to see this process is gathering momentum...
yep me too, as mentioned earlier
best
andrew
- John Hamlen
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 7:26 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Ingatestone, Essex
- Contact:
Re: First Wet-plates
Fabulous images Susie. Thanks for posting. I'm very envious. Must work out getting my hands on a plate holder for my 8x10....
Just trying to get my head around the process: Did you coat shiny aluminium, and end up with an in-camera positive the same way that ambrotypes look positive with a reflective surface behind the glass negative?
John
Just trying to get my head around the process: Did you coat shiny aluminium, and end up with an in-camera positive the same way that ambrotypes look positive with a reflective surface behind the glass negative?
John
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:01 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Bolton
- Contact:
Re: First Wet-plates
Hi John,
In the first post it says "Both are whole plate on trophy aluminium."
So yes pour collodion onto the aluminium, sensitize, expose, dev and fix and you have a positive image as you mention.
In the first post it says "Both are whole plate on trophy aluminium."
So yes pour collodion onto the aluminium, sensitize, expose, dev and fix and you have a positive image as you mention.
- John Hamlen
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 7:26 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Ingatestone, Essex
- Contact:
Re: First Wet-plates
Cheers. This is most interesting! So does one end up with a daguerreotype-like reflectivity to the final "product"?
I was originally looking at going the ambrotype route and glass plates. This would be much more convenient and - I don't know - but maybe 0.5mm thick trophy aluminium has an outside chance of fitting a standard film holder?
Many thanks, John
I was originally looking at going the ambrotype route and glass plates. This would be much more convenient and - I don't know - but maybe 0.5mm thick trophy aluminium has an outside chance of fitting a standard film holder?
Many thanks, John
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:01 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Bolton
- Contact:
Re: First Wet-plates
A Dag is a different ball game, some people do buff their ambros/tintypes, this buffs up the silver and gives it a shiney look.
Trophy Aluminium is probably more convenient, you dont have to clean it as its got a protective film you just peel off, if you drop it it doesnt smash, you dont have to deburr and albumen the edges etc.
Granted its a more expensive but its easier to work with in my opinion.
Trophy Aluminium is probably more convenient, you dont have to clean it as its got a protective film you just peel off, if you drop it it doesnt smash, you dont have to deburr and albumen the edges etc.
Granted its a more expensive but its easier to work with in my opinion.
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:28 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: North Oxon
Re: First Wet-plates
Fourtoes wrote:A Dag is a different ball game, some people do buff their ambros/tintypes, this buffs up the silver and gives it a shiney look.
Trophy Aluminium is probably more convenient, you dont have to clean it as its got a protective film you just peel off, if you drop it it doesnt smash, you dont have to deburr and albumen the edges etc.
Granted its a more expensive but its easier to work with in my opinion.
Tony - in your experience can you use (and in answer to John's point) trophy aluminium in a conventional 10x8 double darkslide?
regards
andrew