Hi folks, hope this post finds you all well(stuffed!!) and full of the seasons spirits(mines a malt, thanks) sorry I meant spirit...
Anyhows, I am looking to profile the scanner in the new year and have seen posts re the Faust targets hereabouts. What do people who have them think of them, I have seen hutch targets for almost £300! is the difference in cost justified?
I am after profiling a Canon 9950f for mainly 5x4 Provia and Astia.
Any help/ advice appreciated
Thanks
Gari[/b]
Faust targets
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:00 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Aviemore, Scotland
- Contact:
Faust targets
you don't need eyes to see, you need vision!
-
- Founder
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Workshop Images: http://grandes-images.com/fr/Paysages/P ... _2009.html
- Location: Plestin-les-Grèves, France
- Contact:
I have the Faust targets for both Provia and Velvia 100; they really seem to be fine; I use Monaco EZColor to create the profiles. I get excellent colour matching and it makes an enormous difference if I try to scan without the profile but using the automatic settings in the scanner driver (yeucchh!!)
My personal advice is, buy with confidence and save tourself a packet.
My personal advice is, buy with confidence and save tourself a packet.
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:58 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Zurich
- Contact:
Joanna, is it really worth getting profiles made for different film-types? I was under the impresion that the point of profiling your scanner is to correct for defects introduced by the scanner itself. Surely profiling for a specific film and the scanner would be counter-productive, or am I missing something?
-
- Founder
- Posts: 1283
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Workshop Images: http://grandes-images.com/fr/Paysages/P ... _2009.html
- Location: Plestin-les-Grèves, France
- Contact:
Here is a series of scans I just made to illustrate the differences. I am using an Epson V700 to scan a Velvia 100 trannie.
First, using the Epson automatic scanning with no adjustments or profile.

Next, I scanned on Auto but with a profile specified to be used whilst scanning.
Using Velvia 100 profile:

Using Provia 100F profile:

Finally, I scanned as I would normally, with adjustments turned off and no profile assigned. Then I assigned the profile once the image was in Photoshop. This is the recommended workflow for profiled scanning.
With Velvia 100 profile assigned:

With Provia 100F profile assigned:

Despite the problems of a low res web image, I can still see differences between all of the above, although they are not as noticeable on an unprofiled monitor.
I have also updated the images held for the "Serendipity Strikes Again" thread in Critique to reflect the final edited images from this trannie.
First, using the Epson automatic scanning with no adjustments or profile.

Next, I scanned on Auto but with a profile specified to be used whilst scanning.
Using Velvia 100 profile:

Using Provia 100F profile:

Finally, I scanned as I would normally, with adjustments turned off and no profile assigned. Then I assigned the profile once the image was in Photoshop. This is the recommended workflow for profiled scanning.
With Velvia 100 profile assigned:

With Provia 100F profile assigned:

Despite the problems of a low res web image, I can still see differences between all of the above, although they are not as noticeable on an unprofiled monitor.
I have also updated the images held for the "Serendipity Strikes Again" thread in Critique to reflect the final edited images from this trannie.