Faust targets

A place to talk about photography, the meaning of life and anything that doesn't quite fit elsewhere
Post Reply
gari
Forum Hero
Posts: 300
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:00 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Location: Aviemore, Scotland
Contact:

Faust targets

Post by gari » Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:47 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

Hi folks, hope this post finds you all well(stuffed!!) and full of the seasons spirits(mines a malt, thanks) sorry I meant spirit...

Anyhows, I am looking to profile the scanner in the new year and have seen posts re the Faust targets hereabouts. What do people who have them think of them, I have seen hutch targets for almost £300! is the difference in cost justified?

I am after profiling a Canon 9950f for mainly 5x4 Provia and Astia.

Any help/ advice appreciated

Thanks

Gari[/b]
you don't need eyes to see, you need vision!

Joanna Carter
Founder
Posts: 1283
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Workshop Images: http://grandes-images.com/fr/Paysages/P ... _2009.html
Location: Plestin-les-Grèves, France
Contact:

Post by Joanna Carter » Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:55 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

I have the Faust targets for both Provia and Velvia 100; they really seem to be fine; I use Monaco EZColor to create the profiles. I get excellent colour matching and it makes an enormous difference if I try to scan without the profile but using the automatic settings in the scanner driver (yeucchh!!)

My personal advice is, buy with confidence and save tourself a packet.

joolsb
Forum Hero
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:58 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Location: Zurich
Contact:

Post by joolsb » Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:14 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

Joanna, is it really worth getting profiles made for different film-types? I was under the impresion that the point of profiling your scanner is to correct for defects introduced by the scanner itself. Surely profiling for a specific film and the scanner would be counter-productive, or am I missing something?

DJ
Site Admin
Posts: 360
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:48 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Location: Norfolk

See other thread

Post by DJ » Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:42 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

There's been a thread on this very subject on the forum already, see :

viewtopic.php?t=215

Joanna Carter
Founder
Posts: 1283
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Workshop Images: http://grandes-images.com/fr/Paysages/P ... _2009.html
Location: Plestin-les-Grèves, France
Contact:

Post by Joanna Carter » Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:31 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00

Here is a series of scans I just made to illustrate the differences. I am using an Epson V700 to scan a Velvia 100 trannie.

First, using the Epson automatic scanning with no adjustments or profile.

Image

Next, I scanned on Auto but with a profile specified to be used whilst scanning.

Using Velvia 100 profile:

Image

Using Provia 100F profile:

Image

Finally, I scanned as I would normally, with adjustments turned off and no profile assigned. Then I assigned the profile once the image was in Photoshop. This is the recommended workflow for profiled scanning.

With Velvia 100 profile assigned:

Image

With Provia 100F profile assigned:

Image

Despite the problems of a low res web image, I can still see differences between all of the above, although they are not as noticeable on an unprofiled monitor.

I have also updated the images held for the "Serendipity Strikes Again" thread in Critique to reflect the final edited images from this trannie.

Post Reply