B&W Fibre Printing Paper recommendations?
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:15 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Scotland
B&W Fibre Printing Paper recommendations?
Hi folks - since I restarted photographing a few years back, I've used a few B&W papers, but am wanting to try out some more.
I like neutral to cold image tones on a plain white base.
I've used a small mountain of Kentmere Fineprint, which though I like, I feel might be able to be beaten; I've also used Ilford Galerie, which I like very much and I don't mind the fact it is graded, and Forte Polywarmtone, which though I didn't like the colour, I really loved the quality feel and the gloss when air-dried.
I generally use Bromophen, or Agfa neutol NE, and my own plain hypo, and tone with selenium just for permanence, not really a colour change.
Has anyone used or could recommend anything else?
Foma Variant looks interesting; I've not tried ordinary Ilford Multigrade, or Kentmere Bromide (well not for many many years) or Adox Fineprint Vario Classic (though I did try one of those beta test boxes of their revamping of MCC, which was very nice).
From my point of view, I am spending a lot of time in there, so I want the results to be worth it. Like I said Forte had the finest look as a finished product out of everything I've tried (despite the colour) and that is the quality I am aiming for.
Final proviso: it has to be fibre
All comments gratefully received.
Cheers
Phil
I like neutral to cold image tones on a plain white base.
I've used a small mountain of Kentmere Fineprint, which though I like, I feel might be able to be beaten; I've also used Ilford Galerie, which I like very much and I don't mind the fact it is graded, and Forte Polywarmtone, which though I didn't like the colour, I really loved the quality feel and the gloss when air-dried.
I generally use Bromophen, or Agfa neutol NE, and my own plain hypo, and tone with selenium just for permanence, not really a colour change.
Has anyone used or could recommend anything else?
Foma Variant looks interesting; I've not tried ordinary Ilford Multigrade, or Kentmere Bromide (well not for many many years) or Adox Fineprint Vario Classic (though I did try one of those beta test boxes of their revamping of MCC, which was very nice).
From my point of view, I am spending a lot of time in there, so I want the results to be worth it. Like I said Forte had the finest look as a finished product out of everything I've tried (despite the colour) and that is the quality I am aiming for.
Final proviso: it has to be fibre
All comments gratefully received.
Cheers
Phil
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:24 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
Re: B&W Fibre Printing Paper recommendations?
Aha! You may find my new paper tests of use. I have tested a range of currently available papers, though not every paper as my budget is limited.
http://www.alistairbaird.co.uk/papers/paper.html
I hope you find it interesting
http://www.alistairbaird.co.uk/papers/paper.html
I hope you find it interesting
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 12:38 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: west yorkshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:15 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Scotland
Hi Folks - thanks for all the interesting replies. I am still in a dillemma, however I am narrowing things down a bit.
Foma is out (as they only start at 9.5x12) - I decided that seeing as I've standardised on 8x10 I can't afford the extra dishes nor the fact my paper safe is only an 8x10 one . . .so, that narrows it down to Multigrade, Galerie and Adox.
Comparing the prints I love (on Forte) I have come to realise that it is the feel of the paper but especially the surface gloss that makes the difference. The Forte had a real quality feel and look to it, which on really close examination sort of knocks the Kentmere into a cocked-hat! Well that's just my opinion.
I might not be adverse to a semi-matt finish, but not like the Kentmere Finegrain one which is a truly horrible texture.
Cheers again
Phil
Foma is out (as they only start at 9.5x12) - I decided that seeing as I've standardised on 8x10 I can't afford the extra dishes nor the fact my paper safe is only an 8x10 one . . .so, that narrows it down to Multigrade, Galerie and Adox.
Comparing the prints I love (on Forte) I have come to realise that it is the feel of the paper but especially the surface gloss that makes the difference. The Forte had a real quality feel and look to it, which on really close examination sort of knocks the Kentmere into a cocked-hat! Well that's just my opinion.
I might not be adverse to a semi-matt finish, but not like the Kentmere Finegrain one which is a truly horrible texture.
Cheers again
Phil
-
- Forum Hero
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:26 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Plymouth.
Re: B&W Fibre Printing Paper recommendations?
I took a look at your site and the comparisons starting with Multigrade IV FB as compared to the others, as this would be the standard to compare other papers with.apochromatic wrote:Aha! You may find my new paper tests of use. I have tested a range of currently available papers, though not every paper as my budget is limited.
http://www.alistairbaird.co.uk/papers/paper.html
I hope you find it interesting
I think the OP would be better off buying trial-packs of various papers and deciding for himself which he finds aesthetically the most pleasing to his eyes.
The choice of any photographic materials whether films, papers and processing chemicals etc is very subjective to individual preference and no will ever agree what is the absolute best of anything. To each their own as they say.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:40 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: San Clemente, California, USA
Many people all around the world have been waiting a long time for this paper:
http://www.adox.de/english/ADOX_Papers/MCC/MCC.html
It should be in stores within a couple of months. I printed on the test coating last year and was thrilled; suggest you give it a try when available.
http://www.adox.de/english/ADOX_Papers/MCC/MCC.html
It should be in stores within a couple of months. I printed on the test coating last year and was thrilled; suggest you give it a try when available.
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:15 pm Etc/GMT-1+01:00
- Location: Scotland
Hi Sal and everyone - thanks for the replies. I too tried the MCC beta test and liked it, though it has been a long time coming.
I'm maybe thinking of the Adox Vario, as I'm just not sure about the extra optical brighteners etc in MGFB - we shall see though, I s'pose a box of 25 is only about £18.
As an interesting aside (well for me) you may have read elsewhere about my brighter than a million suns DeVere 504 - average exposure onto Kentmere of about 6 secs at f16
Well at the weekend I discovered 6 sheets of Forte polywarmtone in a cupboard, exposed a neg that had taken approx 8 secs onto Kentmere, printed for the same density of blacks and the Forte took 30 seconds! Edge burns (usually 2 secs onto Kentmere) were a nice and manageable 8 secs. So, I thought sideways and realised that paper speed is playing a big part in this! Which in turn leads me to the Adox again. I also must say as I've said before, for tactile and image quality (though I'm not keen on warm tones) the Forte is unbeatable. I still have three sheets left and I am reserving them for something that deserves them . . .
P
I'm maybe thinking of the Adox Vario, as I'm just not sure about the extra optical brighteners etc in MGFB - we shall see though, I s'pose a box of 25 is only about £18.
As an interesting aside (well for me) you may have read elsewhere about my brighter than a million suns DeVere 504 - average exposure onto Kentmere of about 6 secs at f16

P